Friday, May 1, 2026

Jewish Holy Book Talmud

Facebook
This image is an example of antisemitic propaganda, which uses fabricated or severely miscontextualized quotes attributed to the Talmud to promote hatred against Jewish people. [1, 2]
  • Fabricated Quotes: The text lists claims that are not supported by the Talmud, such as accusing Judaism of endorsing the murder or enslavement of non-Jews.
  • Antisemitic Caricature: The image features a stereotypical caricature of a Jewish person designed to invoke revulsion and promote racial stereotypes.
  • Conspiracy Narrative: The text "Never Communicate The Talmud With Gentiles" is a common trope used to imply a secret, malicious conspiracy against non-Jewish people. [1, 2, 3, 4]
======


Jewish Holy Book Talmud
(Soferim 15)
Even the best of Goyim should all be killed.
(Yebamoth 98a) All children of Goyim are animals.
(Baba Mezia 114b)
Gentiles "Goys" are not humans, they are beasts.
(Gad Shas 2:2)
A Jew may violate but not marry a non Jew girl.
(Abodah Zarah 36b)
Gentile "Goy" girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
(Sanhedrin 54b)
A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.
(Eben Haezar 6,9)
All non-Jewish are prostitutes.
(Sanhedrin 58b)
If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed.
(Sanhedrin 57a)
When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty.
(Tospoth Jebamoth 84b)
If you eat with a Goy is the same as eating with a dog.
(Baba Mezia 24a)
If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile "Goy" it does not have to be returned.
(Abodah Zarah 22a-22b)
Gentiles "Goys prefer sex with cows.
(Baba Kamma 113a)
Jews may use lies to circumvent a "Goy" Gentile.
(Sanhedrin 19)
Every place the Jews go, they must become commanders of their lords.
(Libbre David 37)
If Gentiles knew that the Talmud teach Jews to destroy them they would kill us openly. Never communicate the Talmud with Gentiles.
(Kethuboth 11b)
When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.
(Bammidber raba c21)
Every Jew who spills the blood of the non-Jew is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.
(Hikkoth Akum X1)
Show no mercy to the Gentiles.
(Abodah Zara 4b)
a Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.
(Sahedrin 59a)
Murdering Gentiles is like killing wild animals.
(Tosefta Abda Zara V111 5)
a Gentile is forbidden to steal, rob or take women slaves from a Jew. But a Jew it's not forbidden to do all this to a Gentile
(Simeon Haddarsen fol 56-0:0)
When the Messish comes every Jew will have 2800 Gentles slaves.
Midrasch Talpioth p225-13
Non-Jews are in human form so that Jews would not be served by beasts. Non-Jew is an animal in human form to serve the Jew day and night.
(Schulchan Aruch Chozen
Hamiszpat 156)
Property of the Gentile belongs to no one and the first Jew that passes has full night to seize it.
(Tosetta Abda Zara V111 5)
a Gentile is forbidden to steal, rob or take women slaves from a Jew. But a Jew it's not forbidden to do all this to a Geritile.
(Schulchan Aruch Chozen
Hamisszpat 346) All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation. Jews can seize it all.
Never Communicate The Talmudntdistrict With Gentiles
T.me/ExposingZionist READ IT!!!!!!
====

==

The Talmud Unmasked

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Talmud Unmasked
AuthorJustinas Pranaitis
Publication date
1892

The Talmud Unmasked (Latin: Christianus in Talmud Iudaeorum: sive, Rabbinicae doctrinae Christiani secreta. English: The Christian in the Jewish Talmud: Secret rabbinical teachings concerning Christians) is a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917), a Lithuanian Catholic priest. The book is a collection of purported quotations from the Talmud and Zohar that are claimed to demonstrate that Judaism despises non-Jews and promotes the murder or injury of non-Jews in some instances. Pranaitis drew on the earlier works of Jakob Ecker and August Rohling.[1]

Scholars classify "The Talmud Unmasked" as an antisemitic and anti-Talmudic work, comparable to "Der Talmud Jude" by Rohling (1871) and "The Traditions of the Jews" by Johann Eisenmenger (1700).[1][2][3] Modern authors agree that Pranaitis was not competent in Aramaic and the work contains mistranslations, plagiarism from those earlier works, and fabrications.

Contents

The Talmud Unmasked is a collection of purported quotes from the Talmud, the Zohar and other Jewish texts.[4]

Although he made use of Hebrew and Latin translations, Pranaitis knew little Hebrew and could not read Aramaic, the primary language of the Talmud, at all, so was not a credible translator. During the 1913 Beilis Affair trial, Pranaitis testified as an expert witness who claimed that Jews would require blood for Passover (i.e., the blood libel). He was made to look foolish by journalist and historian Benzion Katz [he], who devised a set of questions for defense attorneys to ask him on basic information about the Talmud. Katz phrased the question as though Baba Batra was a person, even though it is a Talmudic tractate that Pranaitis cites. Pranaitis did not know any of the information on the stand and answered that he didn't know without noticing the Baba Batra trick, showing he completely lacked the Talmudic expertise he claimed.[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] According to Anthony Julius, the work contains much that is fabricated, plagiarized, and wrongly translated.[13] Stephen E. Atkins notes that in addition to mistranslation, many are taken out of context.[14] Edmund Levin observes that Pranaitis was exposed as a fraud, ignorant of Semitic languages, and that the book was plagiarized from other antisemitic works, even down to typographical errors.[15] Arthur Kurzweil notes it relies on earlier falsifications from Eisenmenger and others.[16] Ronald Modras and Ben-Zion Bokser note that he plagiarized Eisenmenger and Rohling as well.[17][18]

The book includes numerous quotations that are claimed to demonstrate that Jews do not regard non-Jews as human beings, that the Talmud contains blasphemies against Jesus and offensive passages about Christians, that Judaism despises non-Jews, and that the Talmud urges Jews to do a variety of harms to Christians, such as murder and theft, and teaches that each death of a Christian serves as a substitute for the Temple sacrifices, which would then hasten the arrival of the Jewish messiah.[1][19]

Use by apocalyptic groups

Jeffrey Kaplan describes how the book was used by groups to support apocalyptic theories, especially regarding the end-of-times.[4]

See also

Notes

  1.  Levy, Richard (2005). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO Ltd. p. 564. ISBN 978-1851094394Pranaitis drew on the works of the German anti-Talmudists Jakob Ecker and August Rohling. […] Today, [The Talmud Unmasked] is still being distributed by extreme right-wing and clerical circles and can be accessed from a number of antisemitic websites.
  2.  Harris, Constance (2009). The Way Jews Lived: Five Hundred Years of Printed Words and Images. McFarland & Co. p. 255. ISBN 9780786434404.
  3.  Fiordo (1987). "The Keegstra Case: The Anti-Semitic Argument in Modern Day Alberta Schools". In van Eemeren, Frans H. (ed.). Argumentation: Analysis and Practices: Proceedings (Studies of Argumentation in Pragmaties and Discourse Analysis, Vol 3b). Foris Pubns USA. p. 299. ISBN 978-9067653206.
  4.  Kaplan, Jeffrey (1997). Radical Religion in America: Millenarian Movements from the Far Right to the Children of NoahSyracuse University Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 978-0-8156-2687-9.
  5.  Weinberg, Robert (1 January 2015). "Connecting The Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, And The Trial Of Mendel Beilis"Word And Image In Russian History: Essays In Honor Of Gary Marker238–252.
  6.  Perry, Marvin; Schweitzer, Frederick M. (2002), Perry, Marvin; Schweitzer, Frederick M. (eds.), "Ritual Murderers"Antisemitism: Myth and Hate from Antiquity to the Present, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 43–72, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-38512-6_3ISBN 978-1-349-38512-6, retrieved 1 January 2026
  7.  Sirutavičius, Vladas; Staliūnas, Darius; Šiaučiūnaitė-Verbickienė, Jurgita; Housden, Martyn; Strenga, Gustavs (1 January 2020). "Antisemitism in Lithuania in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century"The History of Jews in Lithuania: From the Middle Ages to the 1990s. Brill | Schöningh. doi:10.30965/9783657705757_016ISBN 978-3-657-70575-7.
  8.  Afran, Bruce; Garber, Robert (2004). Jews on Trial. KTAV. pp. 87–88ISBN 9780881258684.
  9.  Samuel, Maurice (1967). Blood Accusation. The Strange History of the Beiliss Case. London.
  10.  Beĭlis, Mendelʹ (1992). Scapegoat on Trial: The Story of Mendel Beilis : the Autobiography of Mendel Beilis, the Defendant in the Notorious 1912 Blood Libel in Kiev. CIS Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56062-166-9.
  11.  Leiman, Shnayer Z. (2009). "From the Pages of Tradition: BENZION KATZ: MRS. BABA BATHRA"Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought42 (4): 51–57. ISSN 0041-0608JSTOR 23264183.
  12.  The Beilis Affair. American Jewish Committee. 1914.
  13.  Julius, Anthony (9 February 2012). Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England. Oxford University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-19-960072-4.
  14.  Atkins, Stephen E. (30 April 2009). Holocaust Denial as an International Movement. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 979-8-216-09856-0.
  15.  Levin, Edmund (25 February 2014). A Child of Christian Blood: Murder and Conspiracy in Tsarist Russia: The Beilis Blood Libel. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-8052-4299-7.
  16.  Kurzweil, Arthur (1 April 2025). The Talmud For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-394-33213-7.
  17.  Modras, Ronald (17 August 2005). The Catholic Church and Antisemitism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-28617-0.
  18.  Bokser, Ben-Zion (1939). Talmudic forgeries: a case study in anti-Jewish propaganda (PDF). New York: Synagogue Council of America. Retrieved 1 January 2026.
  19.  Michael, Robert (2007). Dictionary of antisemitism from the earliest times to the present. Internet Archive. Lanham, Md. : The Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-5862-6.
==

==
https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/1pu46ma/lies_about_talmud_debunked_explanation_of/

Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples

I wrote these explanations spesifically for non-Jews to read, as a countermeasure against the slanderous anti-Semitic campaign on social media. Although these kinds of anti-Semitic campaigns are ridiclous, they can be effective on some people and lead them to misunderstand Judaism. That's why I need to explain these things to people who don't have enough knowledge about Judaism. First, let's examine the sources of Judaism on a diagram and understand the place of the Talmud among these sources to provide deeper understanding.

r/Judaism - Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples

Talmud is a collection of commentaries containing the opinions and debates of rabbis. Talmud should not be perceived as a religious text containing divine and absolute commandments. A passage in the Talmud is often presented as a hypothetical case, a counterpoint, or a counterargument. It's a collection of thought experiments and interpretations. Let's now explain the quotes featured in the antisemitic brochures circulationg on social media by focusing the concrete examples. You'll see that the quotes anti-Semitics cite are mistranslated, taken out of context or entirely fabricated. Here are the explanations:

In short, the Talmud is a collection of commentaries containing the opinions and debates of rabbis. Let's now explain the quotes featured in the antisemitic brochures circulationg on social media by explaining concrete examples. You'll see that the quotes anti-Semitics cite are mistranslated, taken out of context or entirely fabricated. Here are the explanations:

Soferim 15

Even the best of gentiles (non-Jews/Goyim) must be killed.

Explanation: What is meant is that in times of war, you should not consider whether those who fight against you are good or bad in their non-combatant lives. That's what Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says in the chapter. No Jewish scholar has ever interpreted this statement as meaning killing non-Jews in any situation.

 

Yebamoth 98a

All the children of non jews are animals.

Explanation: The chapter includes a discussion of levirate marriages with the widow of a deceased brother. It does not state that all children of non-Jews (goyim) are animals.

 

Baba Metzia 114b

Jews are called humans, but non-Jews (goyim/gentiles) are not called humans. They are beasts

Explanation: Shimon Ben Yochai, said that human graves of non-Jews do not cause tame (טָמֵא) which means ritual impurity. Shimon Ben Yochai excludes gentiles from the concept of human in this context to indicate that graves of non-Jews are not impure by referring Ezekiel 34:31 which states "And you, my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are men ... " are used to refer all of humans. Since ritual matters (graves) are discussed, in section, the word "Adam" (human being) is also used in its Jewish sense. Ruling about the graves of non-Jews is also seen in Yevamot 61a, along with an objection that non-Jews are also considered human beings. In the Talmud, concepts are used according to the context and subject of the section. This conceptualization is also seen in other sections. For example, on anointing oil (which is also a ritual matter) Keritot 6b excludes the idolaters (goyim), from the concept of human beings, based on Ezekiel 34:31, and states that the bodies of non-Jews are exempt from the prohibition in Exodus 30:32 regarding the application of anointing oil to human flesh. Moreover, in Keritot 6b, as in Yevamot 61a, there is an argumentation with an opposing-view on this issue.

Other words for humans Bnei Adam (sons of Adam) in the Gittin section of the Talmud; and HaAdam (human being) in the Avodah Zara section,

 

Gad Shas 2.2

A Jew may violate a Gentile girl, but not marry her.

Explanation: I his is a complete fabrication. There is not even a book called "Gad Shas" in the Talmud.

 

Abodah Zarah 36b

Gentile (non-jew) girls are in a state of niddah (impurity) from birth.

Explanation: The word "niddah" in Avodah Zara 36b refers to a menstruating woman. Even a Jewish woman abstains from rituals while menstruating, meaning "niddah." The point of this passage is that a non-Jewish woman is not subject to rituals as if she were a menstruating Jewish woman.

 

Sanhedrin 57a

There will be no death penalty for a Jew killing a Gentile.

Explanation: The statement "There shall be no death penalty if a Jew kills a non-Jew" in Sanhedrin 57a does not imply that such killing is legitimate, but that punishment is left to God. According to Chief Rabbi Maimonedes, this is also true, and killing a human being is wrong.

 

Sanhedrin 54b

A Jew may have intercourse with a child as long as the child is under nine years old.

Explanation: The text does not specify an "age of consent" or "marriage age"; it merely defines the physical limit of the act of intercourse to determine whether a sexual crime committed by an adult falls into the category of crimes punishable by death. If the victim is younger than this age, the adult perpetrator faces severe penalties other than the death penalty. Because the sexual offenses mentioned in the Torah, which are punishable by death, are based on the act of "sexual intercourse" [ביאה (bi'ah)]. Heinous and perverse acts against victims under the ages of 9 for boys and 3 for girls are considered and punished as "chavalah" (bodily harm). The reason for this is these perverse acts do not fall under the definition of "sexual interaction" in the Torah. In such cases, the perpetrator is sentenced to lashes of rebellion [מכת מרדות (makat mardut)] This punishment is based more on the authority of the rabbis than on the Torah. Therefore, the number of lashes does not have to be 39 as in Torahic whipping [מלקות (malkot)]; it can be more, and there is an exception to the rule of not having two penalties for one crime, so the perpetrator is also liable for penal restitutions.

Generally it should also be noted that the perpetrator must be an adult at the time the crime was committed in order to be punished. The age of adulthood is 13 years and 1 day for boys, 12 years and 1 day for girls. However, this is a separate matter.

 

Ketubot 11b

The man who was with the child at a young age did nothing.

Explanation: In Judaism, virgins receive a higher dowry when they marry. The provision in Ketubot 11b stipulates that if the girl was raped when she was a child, this situation will not change. The phrase "he did nothing wrong", as is sometimes quoted, does not appear. The purpose is to prevent the victim from losing her rights in the future. This perversion is not allowed.

 

Moed Katan 17a

If a person is tempted to do evil, they should go to a place where they are not known and do the evil there

Explanation: This is not a command to do evil. It means a weak-willed sinner should go somewhere instead of bringing shame upon his own community.

 

Sanhedrin 58b

If a Gentile strikes a Jew he must be killed.

Explanation: Interestingly, the statement "If a gentile strikes a Jew, he must be put to death," which is often cited about Sanhedrin 58b, is reversed in the Talmud. Therefore, if a non-Jew strikes a Jew, he must not be put to death. However, one rabbi argued that the rule should be otherwise.

 

Tospoth Jebamoth 84b

If you eat with a goy (non-Jew) it is the same as eating with a dog.

Explanation: In Tosphot Jebamoth 84b, there is no such statement saying that eating with a

Goy (non-Jew) is the same as eating with a dog. It is completely fabricated.

 

Bava Kamna 113a

Jews may lie to outsmart non-Jews

Explanation: Contextually this means that lying is permissible when a non-Jew tries to steal from you. The same applies to a Jew.

 

Avodah Zara 22a-22b

Gentiles prefer sex with cows

Explanation: This is a mistranslation. There is no direct accusation of having anything to do with cows. In fact, Jews were warned not to leave their animals with pagans overnight because of suspicions of heresy towards animals among the pagan tribes of the time. This is a periodic warning.

 

Sanhedrin 57a

A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Gentile (non-Jew/goy)

Explanation: This rule was abolished by Rabbi Gamliel on the grounds that stealing from a non-Jew was considered a chillul hashem (חילול השם), so this was considered disrespectful to God's name.

 

Gittin 57a

Jesus boiling in excrement in hell

Explanation: It is not certain that the person meant here is the Christians' prophet. Even though Gittin 57a ​​states that Jesus was "from Nazareth," you cannot definitively say that this is the Christians' prophet. If you examine the Talmud, you will see that the person referred to as Yeshu HaNotzi lived over a hundred years before the Christians' prophet (around 140 BC) and was a rebellious disciple of Joshua Ben Perahiah.

 

Baba Metzia 24a

If a Jew finds an object lost by a non-Jew, it does not have to be returned.

Explanation: According to the conclusion reached in the Talmudic discussion regarding Baba Metzia 24a, a lost item does not have to be returned if the majority of the people involved are not looking for it. It does not matter whether the true owner is Jewish or not.

 

Sanhedrin 55b

A three-year-old child, betrothed by his father, is betrothed to a relationship.

Explanation: There's another unpleasant slander on the side. It's a sensitive issue. The lower age limits mentioned in Sanhedrin 55b relate to the medical consequences of abuse. These perversions are prohibited in Kiddushin 12b and Kiddushin 41a. Furthermore, Niddah 13b states that child abusers delay the coming of the Messiah. According to Chief Rabbi Maimonedes, also known as the Second Moses, intercourse with a minor who has not reached puberty is forbidden.

 

Sanhedrin 59a

A gentile who engages in Torah study is liable to receive the death penalty.

Explanation: In the chapter, this view is challenged by another rabbi, who entistates that a non-Jew who studies the Torah in good faith is respected like a high priest. Furthermore, the Talmud uses the expression "being sentenced to death" as an exaggeration. For example, the death penalty is prescribed for a Torah scholar who has a stain on his shirt on Shabbat 114a. The point here is the importance of the Torah.

 

Bava Kamma 37b

Non-Jews are outside the law of God and their money is bestowed to Israel

Explanation: What you see to the side is a complete fabrication. The section to which the lie is attributed is in the Talmud's "Nezikin," or "damages," section, which contains opinions regarding the legal liability of animal owners.

My explanations above are also included in the tables I have prepared below. Feel free to share.

r/Judaism - Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples
r/Judaism - Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples
r/Judaism - Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples
r/Judaism - Lies About Talmud DEBUNKED | Explanation of Concrete Examples
60

Comments Section

==

==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNDA9cKg-bU

Debunking the Online War on the Talmud

ILTV Israel News
1,863 views  Jan 20, 2026  #Israelnews #israel #Iltvisraelnews
As false and inflammatory claims about the Talmud spread online, Rabbi Daniel Rowe of Aish explains where these accusations come from, why they keep resurfacing, and how they fuel modern antisemitism.

Help Aish fight online antisemitism around the globe! Donate here: https://iltvisrael.com/aish

Join our community now and receive 24/7 of new & original content from the State of Israel.
https://www.iltv.tv
==

Transcript

Search transcript
Search transcript
0:00Now, from social media influencers to online podcasters, false and inflammatory claims about the Talmud are once again circulating widely. Joining us now in studio is Rabbi Daniel Row,
0:1111 secondswho is taking on these accusations headon and explaining why they're both false and dangerous. Thank you for joining us. Pleasure.
0:1919 secondsSo, Rabbi Row, we're seeing a sudden wave of online attacks claiming that the Talmud promotes immoral or violent behavior. what is actually happening
0:2727 secondsright now in the digital space and why did you feel it was urgent to respond?
0:3232 secondsYeah. So it seems that since October 7th there's been this wave of attempts to attack Israel, attack Jewish people and one of them has been about the religion.
0:4242 secondsLike we saw it when Natao gave a speech a few weeks after October 7th and said the phrase remember what Amalecch did which every Jew recognizes it means
0:5151 secondsnever forget when we're attacked. But anti- people latch on that say, "Oh,
0:5555 secondshe's referring to Samuel chapter 15 when they went to war against Amalik and it's genocidal." The same thing is happening with T. They're going to old quotes that
1:041 minute, 4 secondshave been long debunked, trying to cherrypick them, stick them all over social media and say secretly these Jewish people are into killing non-Jews
1:111 minute, 11 secondsand hating non-Jews. I felt the need to respond when people started reaching out to me, Jews and allies who say, "We can defend Israel, but we we don't know how to defend this. We don't know the
1:191 minute, 19 secondsTalmud." and so now put out a bunch of videos that people can use as a resource to know what's really going on and where these are false and made up and so on or
1:281 minute, 28 secondswhether just out of context or whatever it is.
1:301 minute, 30 secondsIt seems so ridiculous but so important to do this. So now you show that many of these accusations are not new at all but actually recycled like you say recycled
1:391 minute, 39 secondsmedieval pmics that were already debunked centuries ago like you say. Why do you think these fabrications keep resurfacing and why are they so
1:471 minute, 47 secondseffective in today's social media environment? Yeah, it's such a good I mean the story we're really the real story is crazy is 1871 there was a Vienna professor called August Rowling.
1:581 minute, 58 secondsHe literally published a thing called the Talmudic Jew. He ended up in a court case against the rabbi blah and the court didn't know what to do. They
2:052 minutes, 5 secondsappointed two Christian experts who spent two years researching found it was all either fake or out of context.
2:122 minutes, 12 secondsRolling withdrew he lost his job it but it was always recycling. Um Julius Striker was Hitler's big minister of
2:192 minutes, 19 secondsinformation. He loved these quotes because it's so easy. A quote it sounds sincere. It sounds real. Makes Jews look terrible. After World War II, it went
2:272 minutes, 27 secondsinto kind of the Nazi circles, the edge of the web. Since the war began, they've been thrown whether it's Qatari funding or bots or who knows what this is like
2:362 minutes, 36 secondsmoved in heavily in and uh yeah, they're so effective because you believe a quote. It says that sometimes even the line if you look it up is actually a true line. just the context. There's nothing to do with what it sounds like.
2:462 minutes, 46 secondsSo, they're extremely effective on social media and they're playing into this narrative of the Jewish monsters.
2:522 minutes, 52 secondsAnd so, beyond correcting the bad information, what are real world danger dangers? What what are the dangers that these distortions pose when they frame
3:003 minutesJews as following these secret or perverse laws? What does that mean uh for broader conversations about anti-semitism?
3:073 minutes, 7 secondsYeah, it's absolutely plays into anti-semitic narratives. The truth is even if they weren't there, this stuff of the Jews like looking nice on the surface but secretly having this
3:163 minutes, 16 secondsmalicious intent is always at the center of anti-semitic tales. So this just feeds into that and yes it's extremely dangerous. It can lead to apart from
3:233 minutes, 23 secondsdemonization of Israel, it can lead to violence against Jews all over the world.
3:273 minutes, 27 secondsNow you argue that these attacks often present themselves as ideological critiques rather than anti-semitism. Why
3:353 minutes, 35 secondsis that distinction misleading and how should journalists and viewers recognize the difference?
3:403 minutes, 40 secondsYeah. So, first of all, anti-semitism is typically like, oh, if we're not racist against Jews, like I wouldn't, you know,
3:453 minutes, 45 secondsI defend your right to keep your religion, then I can't be anti-semitic.
3:483 minutes, 48 secondsAnti-semitic is this kind of social pathology of Jew demonization. And this stuff is the perfect weapon of Jew demonization. You see, you can't attack
3:573 minutes, 57 secondsthe Bible because Christians believe in the Bible, but you can attack the Talmud. And most people never read it,
4:024 minutes, 2 secondsdon't know it. And so journalists or anyone just seeing this stuff online should find people who know what they're talking about. Don't take our word for it, but allow us to show you walk you
4:104 minutes, 10 secondsthrough. First of all, you'll find about a third of the quotes are literally made up nonsense. Another third are just radically out of context. Like literally
4:184 minutes, 18 secondsthere's a line, for example, that in the middle of the Egyptians pursuing the Israelites into the sea, a rabbi says,
4:234 minutes, 23 seconds"The best of them shall be killed." Take that line out of context. The best of all non-Jews should be killed. It's it's absurd, but you need to see the context.
4:304 minutes, 30 secondsThen you need to see Tamil is extremely complex, right? Large. You can debate something for pages. You could literally have a hypothesis that's rejected.
4:374 minutes, 37 secondsThere's a very famous one. There's a hypothesis. Could it be okay to steal from a non-Jew? And it's rejected. But if you take the hypothesis, so let somebody show you through. Let's see
4:454 minutes, 45 secondsthem what's really going on. And almost all of these will just dissolve. Judaism is a religion that believes in the value of all human beings. The Talmud says all human beings are created in the image of
4:534 minutes, 53 secondsGod and are beloved. That's what we believe. And the attempt to demonize us is a part of this broader attempt to paint Jews as demons.
5:005 minutesWell, Rabbi Ro, thank you very much.
Debunking the Online War on the Talmud

ILTV Israel News
844K subscribers

Subscribe

78


Share

Save

1,863 views  Jan 20, 2026  #Israelnews #israel #Iltvisraelnews
As false and inflammatory claims about the Talmud spread online, Rabbi Daniel Rowe of Aish explains where these accusations come from, why they keep resurfacing, and how they fuel modern antisemitism.

Help Aish fight online antisemitism around the globe! Donate here: https://iltvisrael.com/aish

Join our community now and receive 24/7 of new & original content from the State of Israel.
https://www.iltv.tv
==

No comments:

Post a Comment

Crys Alexandria - Another important read. And why we must go... | Facebook

Crys Alexandria - Another important read. And why we must go... | Facebook Crys Alexandria eootSrdpns84hc02p11r5a4im ugm4tmhct4ag89i :h6005l...