Monday, September 14, 2026

The Elimination Project | B'Tselem

The Elimination Project | B'Tselem






The
Elimination
Project

Israel’s Systematic Dismantling of Palestinian Collective Life in the West Bank
Share:

Since the current Israeli government took office at the end of 2022, and even more so since October 2023, Israel has dramatically escalated its assault on all aspects of Palestinian life in the West Bank. At any moment, Palestinians may be exposed to violence by soldiers or armed settler militias, arrested and imprisoned, subjected to abuse and humiliation, and sometimes even killed.

The Elimination Project draws on more than 2,000 testimonies B’Tselem collected from Palestinians since October 2023 and over three decades of documenting the Israeli apartheid regime’s human rights abuses in the West Bank. The report looks at the current reality not as a collection of isolated incidents or specific harms, but as part of a comprehensive mechanism of elimination that works to dismantle the conditions for continued Palestinian existence in the West Bank, while deepening Jewish control and supremacy in an irreversible manner. An examination of the current reality in the West Bank reveals that the project of elimination is now being implemented more openly, directly and violently than before, and increasingly relies on cooperation between official state authorities and settler militias operating in the West Bank with state backing and support.
Download Full Report (PDF)Download Summary (PDF)
 
ThE ElImInaTIon ProJEcT
Executive summary
At the time of publication, the West Bank is under a sweeping Israeli assault that is systematically and at an accelerating pace dismantling the foundations of Palestinian existence. Since the formation of the current government at the end of 2022, and with even greater intensity since October 2023, Israel has dramatically escalated its assault on all areas of life for Palestinians in the West Bank. The ability to get to work, take children to school, attend university, receive medical care or municipal services, meet with family and acquaintances, cultivate one's land, go on vacation, or attend cultural events, along with hundreds of other ordinary activities that make up daily life, are all under constant Israeli attack and are sometimes denied altogether. Over and above all this looms a constant threat to life and bodily integrity. At any moment, Palestinians may be exposed to violence by soldiers or armed settler militias, arrested and imprisoned, subjected to abuse and humiliation, and sometimes even killed. As the report shows, this combined assault, which targets Palestinians both as individuals and as a collective, has turned the lives of some 3.5 million people into a constant struggle against the oppression and dispossession imposed by the Israeli regime.
Human rights documentation, and the public discourse surrounding it, tend to focus on individual incidents of concrete harm. This report takes a broader view, looking at these different violations together. It examines the reality in the West Bank as a complex system with an underlying logic, implemented through different practices by a range of Israeli actors working at the same time and in coordination with one another. Viewed this way, Israel's actions in the West Bank are not simply a series of separate violations of individual and collective rights. Rather, they are part of a comprehensive mechanism of elimination. In this context, "elimination" means sustained harm to the material, social and political conditions that enable Palestinian collective existence – land, institutions, language, culture, social ties, leadership, shared memory and history – as well as to the possibility of imagining and sustaining a shared future. Israel's project of elimination in the West Bank is reshaping the territory and the conditions of life within it so that Israeli control and Israeli presence become continuous, entrenched, and permanent, while Palestinian existence becomes fragmented, vulnerable, and dependent.
This report shows how Israel is implementing this mechanism of elimination through five main domains: violence and intimidation, movement restrictions, economic strangulation, social and political destruction, and ethnic cleansing and territorial takeover. These five domains operate at once and reinforce one another. Movement restrictions and economic strangulation damage livelihoods, social ties, and Palestinians' ability to sustain institutions and engage in political life. The resulting political and social harm weakens Palestinians' ability to defend their rights and maintain their ties to the land. Together, they facilitate the expansion of israeli control over the space and the displacement of Palestinians from it, tearing apart communities and devastating homes, livelihoods, collective memory and geographic contiguity. Violence is the central means of coercion that makes the entire system possible and accelerates its operation.
The report draws on the body of knowledge accumulated by B'Tselem over decades of documenting Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights in the West Bank, an analysis of Israeli regime policy, and approximately 2,000 testimonies collected in recent years from Palestinians living in the West Bank, as well as analysis of official documents, legislation, government resolutions, and other reports. The report connects the different violations, examines the logic that ties them together and the mechanisms that enable them, and presents an overall picture of the reality the Israeli regime is creating in the West Bank.
The logic of elimination and the regime framework
To understand the reality now taking shape in the West Bank, it is necessary to examine the ideological roots and governing structures on which this Israeli mechanism of elimination rests. The term "logic of elimination," coined by Australian historian Patrick Wolfe, describes how a settler-colonial project works to reduce, dismantle and remove Indigenous existence as a collective with a connection to the land. Elimination can be carried out through direct actions to reduce Indigenous presence, including killing, expulsion and confinement to small enclaves. Yet it can also take the form of an ongoing mechanism that uses legal, planning, economic and geographic measures to prevent refugees from returning, dispossess people of land, fragment communities, control movement and attack social and political institutions. These measures work together to destroy the conditions necessary for the Indigenous population to maintain collective existence on the land. 
 
The Zionist-Israeli project demonstrates the key features of settler colonialism: establishing Jewish-Israeli sovereignty in a space inhabited by an Indigenous Palestinian population, while undermining Palestinian existence through marginalization, expulsion, dispossession and fragmentation. Defining the Zionist-Israeli project as settler colonialism does not deny Jewish historical, religious and cultural connections to the space, the continuous presence of a Jewish community in it, or the long history of persecution, displacement and violence against Jews. The question it poses regarding the Zionist-Israeli project is not whether a Jewish connection to the space exists, but concerns the ways in which the Zionist project sought to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli sovereignty in a space where Palestinians lived and continue to live.
The Nakba was the first large-scale manifestation of this logic of elimination. Between 1947 and 1949, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled or fled their homes, became refugees and were prevented from returning to their homeland. Hundreds of Palestinian communities were destroyed and depopulated. Their property was plundered, privately or institutionally, and their lands were made available for Israeli settlement. In 1967, with the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel expanded its control and imposed direct military rule on millions of Palestinians. It expropriated land, established settlements, restricted Palestinian planning and development, and fragmented the territory. The Oslo Accords did not interrupt this process. While establishing the Palestinian Authority and transferring limited powers to it, the accords left Israel in control of key aspects of Palestinian space and life, within a framework in which settlement, dispossession and spatial fragmentation continued and deepened. 
Apartheid is the regime structure that organizes and preserves Jewish supremacy and control over Palestinians throughout the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, where a single Israeli regime grants rights, protections, resources and political power differently to Israeli-Jews and Palestinians. In the West Bank, the institutional distinction between the two groups is especially stark: Israeli settlers are subject to Israeli civil law and enjoy full political rights, state services and state protection, while Palestinians living in the same space are subject to military rule and military law and cannot participate in determining the policies and laws that govern almost every aspect of their lives. The fragmentation of the Palestinian collective into different legal and spatial groups is another aspect of this regime, itself producing fragmented Palestinian geographies and forms of both individual and collective life.
The project of elimination in the West Bank, described in detail in this report, operates within this regime's structure through a twofold process: Israel dismantles Palestinian existence while reorganizing the space to expand and institutionalize Israeli control and presence. Land and resources are transferred to Israeli control; settlements, outposts and farms expand; and the systems of law, planning, infrastructure and funding stablish a contiguous, permanent Israeli presence. The two processes are intertwined: dismantling Palestinian existence enables the expansion of Israeli control and presence, while that expansion entrenches and deepens Palestinian displacement and fracturing.
While the Elimination Project is not new, since the current Israeli government took office at the end of 2022, and even more so since October 2023, it has accelerated and intensified. Authorities, state funding, and political power have been handed to actors committed to expanding settlements, advancing annexation, and pushing Palestinians aside; resources are funneled to settlements, including farms and outposts, while the alignment between state institutions, the military, the settlement movement, and settler militias has grown tighter and more overt. Actions previously presented as temporary, exceptional or driven by security needs are now carried out on a broad scale and in a more direct and openly declared manner.
The "Decisive Plan", published by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in 2017, is a key document for understanding the current reality in the West Bank because it openly articulates the logic of elimination and links settler-colonial ideology to a political action plan. The plan gives Palestinians three options: live under Jewish supremacy while relinquishing their politcal claims, leave, or face violent suppression if they resist. While the plan has not been formally adopted in full as a government decision or enacted as law, central elements of its logic have in recent years been translated into policy, budget allocations, delegation of powers and practices implemented on the ground.
The current escalation in the West Bank is unfolding in parallel with the genocide Israel is committing against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. In Gaza, the logic of elimination has taken its most extreme form; in the West Bank, it is realized in other forms, through the five domains of action described in the report. The two arenas are not detached. The normalization of the mass killing and colossal destruction Israel is inflicting on the Gaza Strip has dramatically expanded the boundaries of violence perceived as legitimate and deployed by the Israeli regime against Palestinians. Since October 2023, previously rarer practices associated with the assault on Gaza have become more common in the West Bank, including airstrikes, large-scale destruction of residential areas and infrastructure, mass displacement, and a relaxation of the open-fire policy.
The Mechanism of Elimination in the West Bank
Israel's elimination mechanism in the West Bank operates through five central domains of action: violence and intimidation, movement restrictions, economic strangulation, social and political destruction, and ethnic cleansing and territorial takeover. Together, these domains restrict West Bank Palestinians' ability to maintain the basics of daily life while also undermining the conditions that enable Palestinian society to exist as a political, social and territorial body with institutions, collective rights and a shared future. The significance of each domain lies not only in the direct harm it causes, but also in its relationship with the other domains and its contribution to the cumulative result.
Violence and intimidation
Violence in the West Bank functions as a central mechanism of control, displacement and dismantling. Its effects are not confined to those who are directly killed, injured, imprisoned, beaten or expelled from their homes. It intimidates the entire population. It narrows the range of action available to Palestinians as individuals, families and communities. At any moment, soldiers may break into a home; armed settlers may arrive at a grazing area; a checkpoint may close without explanation; or a person may be arrested, beaten or killed. In such conditions, every routine activity requires a calculation of risk. Fear is not a byproduct of the violence, but part of how it operates as a means of coercion and of the outcome it seeks to produce.
The violence is inflicted by the Israeli military, the police and the Shin Bet, alongside settlement security coordinators, settlement security squads and settler militias. Some operate as official arms of the state; others operate with state support or protection, or within a sphere of almost complete impunity. Armed settler militias attack villages, shepherding communities, farmland and grazing areas using weapons and off-road vehicles supplied by the state, while the military is often present, fails to prevent the violence and sometimes actively participates in it: soldiers block access roads, fire tear gas or live ammunition at Palestinians who try to defend themselves and their property, and soldiers who live in settlements take part in routine violence directed at neighboring Palestinian communities. The lines between military violence, state violence and civilian settler violence are blurred and the different actors effectively function as one system.
Since October 2023, the Israeli military has recruited thousands of settlers into Regional Defense Battalions for service in the areas where they live, while thousands more have joined settlement and outpost security squads. During this time, B'Tselem has documented settlers exercising "military" powers: stopping and arresting Palestinians, demanding papers, demolishing structures and imposing closures on entire communities. These practices further blur the distinction between agents of violence – armed settlers, soldiers and other official actors.
The number of Palestinians killed in the West Bank has risen dramatically in recent years. Between 7 October 2023 and 30 June 2026, Israel killed 1,087 Palestinians in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Of those killed, 242 were children and 21 were women.
During this period, Israel also expanded its use of airstrikes, large-scale incursions into densely populated areas and destruction of infrastructure in refugee camps. Lethal violence is part of a broader apparatus that includes night raids, home invasions, searches, detentions, threats, humiliation, surveillance and intrusions into private spaces. Together, these measures create a routine in which Palestinians have no safe space where their lives can proceed without the shadow of Israeli oppression hanging over them.
Mass arrests and incarceration are another central arm of the same mechanism. Over decades, Israel has imprisoned hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Practices of abuse and torture have served not only as means of punishment, but also as tools of broad deterrence, intended to make clear to Palestinians that any participation in political or civic activity or resistance to the Israeli apartheid regime may end in detention without trial, frequently accompanied by severe violence. Like the violence employed by the Israeli regime, the constant threat of arrest and imprisonment is also intended to intimidate Palestinians. Since October 2023, Israel has expanded the use of the incarceration system as a means of repression and intimidation directed both at individuals and at the Palestinian collective as a whole, and detention and prison facilities have become a network of torture camps in which every Palestinian who enters is condemned to ongoing physical and psychological abuse. According to B'Tselem's monitoring, between October 2023 and June 2026 at least 32 detainees and prisoners from the West Bank died in Israeli prison facilities as a result of violence, systemic neglect and denial of medical care.
In this way, killing, violence, threats and incarceration work together to sow fear, reduce resistance and enable the operation of the other domains of elimination.
Movement restrictions
The ability to move through space is a precondition for social, economic, familial and political life. When a person cannot reach their land, a hospital, work, school or the nearest city, land ownership or the existence of social institutions and services lose some of their practical significance. Israel's system of control over Palestinian movement rests on longstanding infrastructure: checkpoints between the West Bank and Israel, East Jerusalem and Jordan; internal checkpoints within the West Bank; gates at the entrances to Palestinian communities; the Separation Barrier; bypass roads; roads prohibited or restricted to Palestinian traffic; a permit system; military orders; and various types of physical obstructions. Together, these have created a fragmented and discontinuous Palestinian space in which Palestinian movement depends on permits and on decisions by soldiers, other armed forces, officials and sometimes also by settlers.
Since October 2023, Israel has used this infrastructure in a more intensive, arbitrary and violent manner. According to B'Tselem data, between October 2023 and June 2026 Israel established more than 200 new checkpoints and blocked dozens of Palestinian communities’ access to main roads, and to roads between Palestinian communities. Such obstructions are opened and closed without advance notice, short trips stretch into hours, and people do not know whether they will reach work, school or medical care, or whether they will be able to return home. Israel has revoked all permits allowing Palestinians to enter areas within the Green Line.
Alongside official closures, settlers block roads, threaten drivers and attack Palestinians traveling on them, and sometimes pressure the military to close Palestinian traffic routes.
Control over movement operates in two complementary directions: it breaks Palestinian space into enclaves and isolated communities that depend on entrances, gates, permits and alternative, rough roads, while at the same time producing Israeli territorial contiguity through roads and infrastructure that serve Israelis. Movement restrictions are directly linked to dispossession. When farmers cannot reach their land, shepherds cannot reach grazing areas, workers cannot reach their workplaces, and students, teachers or medical teams cannot reach their destinations, movement restrictions also harm livelihoods, health, education, social ties and the ability to remain on the land. Often, denial of access to land creates conditions for an Israeli takeover of that land. A blocked road or closed gate is therefore not merely a movement restriction; they are an instrument serving the mechanism dispossession and elimination.
Economic strangulation
The economic strangulation of Palestinians in the West Bank harms the material conditions that allow them to earn a living, maintain a home, cultivate land, study, receive medical treatment and plan for the future. It is manifested in poverty, unemployment and a significant decline in living standards. But it also functions as a mechanism of control and sustained pressure, increasing Palestinian society's dependence on Israeli rule. Since 1967, Israel has restricted independent Palestinian economic development, channeled the Palestinian labor force into the Israeli labor market, controlled resources and crossings, and prevented independent development of infrastructure, industry and trade. The division of the West Bank into Areas A, B and C under the Oslo Accords left most land reserves, natural resources and water sources under Israeli control. The agreements also left Israel in control of the Palestinian economy's prospects for development and independence by preserving control over imports and exports and over policy areas that directly affect the Palestinian economy.
Since October 2023, Israel has used this dependence more aggressively. It has revoked almost all permits allowing West Bank Palestinians to work inside the Green Line, cutting more than 140,000 people off from their main source of livelihood. The unemployment rate, which stood at 13.1% in 2022, surged past 31.3% in 2024. Economic distress forced some to risk entering areas within the Green Line without a permit, risking arrest and even death: between 7 October 2023 and 30 June 2026, at least 26 Palestinian workers were killed while attempting to cross the Separation Barrier for work.
At the same time, Israel intensified delays and deductions from the tax revenues it collects on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, impairing the PA's ability to pay salaries and provide basic services. Israeli control over the Palestinian financial system, water, energy, land and infrastructure enables it to exert sustained pressure that harms households, businesses and Palestinian institutions alike.
For years, Israel has prevented independent Palestinian development of water infrastructure and energy production, while also damaging existing infrastructure and local initiatives to develop alternative energy sources. Economic harm is also inflicted through the other domains of elimination: movement restrictions prevent access to workplaces and markets; violence by the military and settler militias prevents access to farmland, grazing areas and water sources; and territorial takeover blocks Palestinian development. For many families, farmland, olive trees, vineyards and flocks are not only sources of income but also an economic safety net, an intergenerational connection to the land and a foundation for communal life. Uprooting trees, stealing flocks and keeping farmers off their land do more than harm immediate income. They disrupt traditional agricultural knowledge and attachment to the land, and sever foundations for life built over generations, undermining the ability to stay on the land.
Economic strangulation extends from households to the institutions and services that sustain society. When families cannot buy food, repay debts or send their children to school, and when education, health and welfare systems are forced to operate under chronic budget shortages, Palestinian society's ability to maintain institutional continuity, community resilience and prospects for the next generation is reduced. Economic strangulation, therefore, is not merely a byproduct of control; it is a mechanism used to dismantle Palestinian existence.
Social and political destruction
Social and political destruction undermines the institutions, relationships and spaces that enable Palestinians to organize, represent themselves, preserve knowledge and memory, and act toward a shared future. Since 1967, Israel has imposed military rule on Palestinians in the West Bank that prohibits or restricts nearly every form of independent Palestinian political activity. Through military orders and legislation, Israel outlaws civil society organizations and political parties, closes institutions, prevents demonstrations, arrests political activists, and labels political parties, youth movements, popular committees, civil society organizations, student groups, journalists and human rights defenders as "terrorists" or accuses them of "incitement". Between 1967 and 2019, Israel outlawed more than 411 political organizations, including all major Palestinian political parties.
Since October 2023 Israel has intensified its attack on every form of organization, protest and expression. Israel has arrested elected officials, activists, academics, students and journalists; raided NGO offices; restricted demonstrations and nonviolent protests; and expanded surveillance and arrests over social media posts. Participation in party or student activity, organizing a demonstration, documenting human rights violations, and even assisting victims of violence can lead to arrest, imprisonment and harm to activists and their families. In this way, incarceration serves not only to punish individuals but also to deter the public and restrict the possibility of collective action.
The suppression of demonstrations, and the routine use of violent and sometimes lethal methods to disperse them, has for years been one of the main ways Israel has undermined Palestinian organizing. In the seven months between 7 October 2023 and mid-May 2024, Israeli forces killed at least 28 Palestinians, including 11 minors, in demonstrations or in connection with them. By comparison, this figure is almost half the number of Palestinians Israeli forces killed in demonstrations during the entire 13 years preceding October 2023. The intensifying violence and wave of arrests impacted protest organizers and prominent activists as well, resulting, over the course of 2024, in the decline of demonstrations that had taken place for years in villages and towns across the West Bank.
The assault is also directed at the spaces in which shared life is created and preserved: schools, universities, cultural and religious centers, archives, the press and community institutions. Raids, movement restrictions and economic hardship force educational institutions to reduce teaching hours or stop operating altogether; attacks on journalists and documentation equipment restrict the ability to report what is happening; and Israel's campaign against UNRWA, which included, among other things, the enactment of two laws banning or restricting the agency's operations, harms not only the essential services UNRWA provides to refugees, but also one of the central institutional frameworks preserving refugee status and Palestinian political and historical memory.
In public space, this is compounded by the erasure of Palestinian symbols and the saturation of the landscape with Israeli ones. Palestinian flags are removed from homes, institutions and public spaces, sometimes through violence and arrests. At the same time, tens of thousands of Israeli flags are placed along roads and at the entrances to Palestinian communities. Control over symbols is not trivial: it expresses a claim to exclusivity over space, history and the political identity permitted within it.
Even under these conditions, Palestinian political and social life persists. Palestinians continue to organize, document, teach, write, pursue legal action, preserve memory, defend their land, maintain institutions and rebuild community spaces. This continuity underscores that elimination is not a completed state, but an ongoing process deployed against a collective that continues to exist and resist.
Ethnic cleansing and territorial takeover
The way Israel takes over space and the growing manifestations of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank are the clearest expressions of the two dimensions of colonial elimination: dismantling, on the one hand, the conditions for Palestinian existence in the territory, while establishing, on the other hand, a contiguous and institutionalized Israeli space. Since 1967, Israel has seized upwards of two million dunams [1 dunam = 0.1 hectares], more than one-third of the West Bank, through an array of legal, planning and administrative mechanisms: declarations of "state lands," "closed military zones," "firing zones," nature reserves and archaeological sites; planning and building restrictions; demolition of homes and infrastructure; establishment of settlements; and construction of roads and infrastructure connecting settlements to Israel. Ostensibly, these are different tools justified on different grounds, but together they shrink Palestinian living space and expand the space available to Jewish-Israelis.
Alongside the official and bureaucratic track, settler militias operate from farms and outposts that receive budgets, equipment, infrastructure and military protection. Establishing agricultural farms and outposts enables small numbers of armed settlers to operate from them as militias and take over vast areas in a short time: they block roads, prevent access to grazing areas and water sources, attack residents, damage property and flocks, and enlist the military and police against Palestinian communities. As of July 2026, Israel had taken control of more than 1,070,000 dunams through these militias, amounting to 18% of the West Bank. Between 2023 and 2025, 185 new outposts were established, approximately 130 of them farm outposts.
Violence, denial of access to land, demolition of homes and infrastructure, and the absence of protection create a coercive environment in which Palestinian communities cannot remain on their land. As of June 2026, this takeover had led to the expulsion of 64 Palestinian shepherding communities from their homes and the partial expulsion of 15 more. Such forcible transfer does not always require direct physical expulsion; it also occurs when the state or actors operating under its protection make life in a place impossible. When such a pattern is aimed at removing a particular ethnic or national group from an area, it is commonly described as ethnic cleansing. In the West Bank, this pattern reduces Palestinian presence, expands Jewish-Israeli presence and breaks up the continuity of Palestinian life by pushing Palestinians into enclaves.
Another form of displacement and takeover is evident in the refugee camps in the northern West Bank. Since January 2025, the military has displaced some 33,000 residents of the Jenin, Tulkarm and Nur Shams refugee camps from their homes. It has destroyed buildings and infrastructure, stated that it would maintain its hold on the camps for the time being, and has prevented most residents from returning. This displacement forms part of a transition to a new phase of military action in refugee camps and other densely populated residential areas throughout the West Bank, larger and more aggressive.
Expulsion from the land is also expulsion from home, community, school and livelihood. After a community is displaced, its land becomes grazing territory for settler farms; access roads are closed, Israeli infrastructure is established in its place, and Palestinian presence is erased from the landscape. Palestinians sometimes remain only a short distance from their land, but with no ability to return to the way of life, livelihood and community that existed there. Ethnic cleansing and territorial takeover are the result of the combined operation of the other four domains, while also reinforcing their effects. Loss of land damages territorial contiguity, the economic base and the community fabric, further reducing the possibility of sustaining Palestinian life in the space over time.
The legal implications of the Elimination Project in the West Bank
The "elimination project" is not a discrete legal category, but a term that describes the cumulative significance of the apartheid regime together with policies and acts that international law recognizes and prohibits, including annexation, settlement construction, forcible transfer, persecution, systematic violence, and the denial of fundamental rights. Many of the practices through which the five domains described above are implemented may also constitute violations of the law of occupation and international human rights law, war crimes or crimes against humanity, including unlawful killing, torture, unlawful imprisonment, collective punishment, persecution, expulsion and forcible transfer, and the establishment of settlements. Taken together, they cannot be understood only as separate violations, but as part of an integrated system through which the elimination project is advanced.
The prohibition of apartheid under international law provides the central legal framework for analyzing the regime in the West Bank. The Israeli regime distinguishes between two groups – Jews and Palestinians – and allocates status, rights, protections, and resources differently between them; it maintains an institutionalized system of systematic domination and oppression of Palestinians; and it commits inhuman acts to establish and preserve that domination. 
The law of occupation continues to apply in the West Bank, but it is neither an alternative to the apartheid framework nor sufficient on its own to capture the full legal picture. The apartheid regime in the West Bank works mainly through military control, while annexation and settlements entrench Israel's control over the territory, alter its composition and violate the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. In its July 2024 advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice held that Israel's continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful and that it must end it as soon as possible.
The broad impunity enjoyed by soldiers, police officers and settlers who harm Palestinians allows the mechanisms of elimination to persist, become entrenched and take root as part of the Israeli apartheid regime. Between 2016 and 2024, 2,427 complaints concerning harm by soldiers to Palestinians and their property were submitted to the military law enforcement system; investigations were opened in only 22.7% of them, and indictments were filed in only 0.9%. The same pattern appears in cases involving violence by Israelis against Palestinians: 93.6% of investigation files opened between 2005 and 2025 ended without an indictment, and only 3% ended in a full or partial conviction. Impunity is not restricted to punishment after the fact. It produces conditions in which perpetrators can expect the system to stand behind them, thereby enabling the violence to continue.
Conclusion: The Duty to Stop the Elimination Project and End the Israeli Apartheid Regime
The reality described here leads to a clear moral and political conclusion: the systematic and violent oppression Israel inflicts on Palestinians in the West Bank cannot be ended through more effective enforcement against particularly violent settlers, the removal of certain checkpoints, a partial construction freeze, or piecemeal policy changes. Such steps may prevent some crimes and rights violations and protect people in specific cases, and are therefore important in the immediate term. But they do not alter the structure that produces violence, dispossession and oppression. The practices described in this report are not aberrations but integral to how the regime operates.
Protecting human rights requires stopping the project of elimination and ending Israel's apartheid regime and military control over Palestinians. Sporadic fixes cannot turn a settler-colonial project based on dispossession into a system that respects human rights. Palestinians' rights can never be guaranteed within a system that works to deny them political power, control their land, and dismantle their ability to exist as a collective. A regime based on Jewish supremacy, apartheid and dispossession is illegitimate. It cannot be accepted or normalized, nor is it enough merely to reduce some of the violence and dispossession it produces.
For years, the international community has watched these events as they unfold in the West Bank while continuing to treat them as a series of separate acts and incidents: settlement expansion, settler violence, demolitions, roadblocks, land expropriation, or the killing of Palestinians. Isolated condemnations and repeated calls to show restraint, avoid unilateral steps, or return to the negotiating table give Israel time, latitude and immunity to continue advancing its elimination project. The political, military and economic support for Israel, and the diplomatic protection it receives, provide the Israeli regime with the resources, legitimacy, and freedom to continue committing crimes against Palestinians.
States and international institutions have a moral and legal obligation to do everything in their power and use all means at their disposal under international law to prevent Israel from continuing its crimes, bring them to an end, and protect Palestinians from them. International impunity prevents accountability for crimes already committed and is also one of the conditions that allows such crimes to continue. The genocide in Gaza has not prompted the fundamental shift in international policy demanded by the scale of the crimes, and the same policy enables the continued violence, economic strangulation, social and political destruction and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.
Analyzing the elimination project also requires attention to the ways Palestinians act within and against it: they hold onto their land, sustain and develop institutions and social and political frameworks, preserve memory and identity, document, organize and resist. These actions are an integral part of the reality described in the report and of the ongoing struggle over space, life within it and the possibility of shaping a Palestinian future.
Any just political order must be grounded in recognition of Palestinians as political subjects with individual and collective rights, not as a population to be managed by Israel or international actors. Palestinians' rights to liberty, equality, self-determination, and to live collectively as a people are the premise, not a matter subject to the consent of the regime that controls them. Palestinians' political status and the conditions of their lives cannot continue to be determined through Israeli coercion, military control, or arrangements that preserve existing relations of domination.
B'Tselem works for a future of freedom, justice, equality, and democracy for all people living between the river and the sea. Such a future requires ending the apartheid regime and military rule over Palestinians, and guaranteeing individual and collective rights, equal political participation, and a meaningful opportunity for everyone to shape their future. Ending the crimes and rights violations is a necessary condition, but justice also requires recognition of injustices, accountability for crimes committed, and confronting the ongoing consequences of past and present dispossession and displacement, violence, and social and political destruction. All this requires a fundamental transformation of the existing regime structure and the construction of a system grounded in the equal worth of every human being and guaranteeing the right to live in freedom, equality, safety, and dignity.
 
Supported primarily by funding from foreign states. The names of the foreign states from which the donations  were received are on the Registrar's website.


Read full report

보고서 <제거 프로젝트: 서안지구 내 팔레스타인 집단적 삶에 대한 이스라엘의 조직적 해체(The Elimination Project: Israel's Systematic Dismantling of Palestinian Collective Life in the West Bank)>에 대한 1,000단어 분량의 요약 및 비평 평론입니다.

[요약] 이스라엘의 '제거 프로젝트' 보고서

이스라엘의 저명한 인권단체 비첼렘(B'Tselem)이 발간한 본 보고서는 서안지구(West Bank)에서 자행되는 이스라엘의 정책을 개별적 인권 침해의 집합이 아니라, 팔레스타인인을 독립된 집단으로 존속하지 못하게 만드는 '제거의 논리(Logic of Elimination)'에 기반한 총체적 기획으로 규정한다. 보고서는 이러한 제거 기획이 가자지구에서의 극단적 파괴와 궤를 같이하며, 서안지구 전역을 다섯 가지 핵심 축을 통해 체계적으로 해체하고 있다고 고발한다.

첫째, 폭력과 공포 조성이다. 이스라엘 정규군과 무장 정착민 민병대 간의 경계가 완전히 무너졌다. 정착민 폭동은 군의 비호와 협력 아래 구조화되었으며, 군의 사살 규정은 무차별적인 수준으로 완화되었다. 주거지 야간 급습, 드론 폭격, 고문, 성폭력 및 시신 훼손은 일상적인 불안과 공포를 심어 팔레스타인 공동체의 저항 의지를 꺾고 삶의 기반을 파괴한다.

둘째, 이동의 통제와 시공간적 파편화다. 서안지구 전역에 설치된 900개 이상의 검문소, 철문, 바리케이드와 분리장벽은 팔레스타인 거주지를 고립된 섬(enclave)들로 분할했다. 정착민 전용 도로망을 통해 이스라엘인에게는 연속적인 영토를 보장하는 반면, 팔레스타인 주민에게는 통행의 극단적 불확실성을 강요하여 출근, 통학, 응급 의료 접근 등 일상적 기능 자체를 마비시킨다.

셋째, 전면적인 경제적 질식이다. 1967년 점령 이후 축적된 경제적 종속 구조를 무기화했다. 10만 명 이상의 노동 허가를 전면 취소하여 가계 소득을 차단했고, 팔레스타인 자치정부(PA)의 세금 환급금을 압류해 공공 서비스를 파탄에 이르게 했다. 또한 올리브 나무 수천 그루를 조직적으로 파괴하고 방목지와 온실을 철거함으로써 대대로 이어져 온 농업 기반을 철저히 무너뜨렸다.

넷째, 사회적·정치적 기반 파괴다. 테러 방지법과 군사 명령을 자의적으로 적용하여 합법적 시민단체, 인권기구, 풀뿌리 위원회를 테러 단체로 낙인찍고 활동가를 대거 투옥했다. 나아가 팔레스타인 국기 게양을 금지하고, 역사적 기억을 보존하는 문화 기관을 탄압하며, 유엔 팔레스타인 난민구호기구(UNRWA)의 활동을 법적으로 금지함으로써 난민의 지위와 민족적 정체성 자체를 지워나가고 있다.

다섯째, 영토 강탈과 인종 청소다. 국가 소유지 선언, 군사 사격장 지정, 정착 농장(Farm Outposts) 설립을 통해 팔레스타인 토지를 지속적으로 수탈한다. 무장 정착민의 폭력과 자원 차단으로 거주지를 버리게 만드는 방식의 '강제 이주'를 조장하며, 그 자리에 정착촌 인프라를 확대해 유대인 주권의 영구적이고 비가역적인 영토화를 완성하려 한다.

보고서는 이 모든 과정이 베잘렐 스모트리히의 <결정적 계획(Decisive Plan)>에서 제시된 유대인 우월주의적 아파르트헤이트 체제의 실현 과정이며, '정치적 포기, 국외 퇴거, 혹은 무력 진압'이라는 세 가지 선택지만을 강요하는 식민주의적 인종 청소의 명백한 증거라고 결론짓는다.

[평론] 식민주의적 '완전 해체'의 기록과 국제사회의 공모

비첼렘의 본 보고서는 이스라엘-팔레스타인 갈등을 바라보는 기존의 '점령' 혹은 '분쟁 관리'라는 패러다임을 근본적으로 뒤흔든다. 그동안 국제 인권 담론은 개별적인 총격 사건, 정착민 폭행, 불법 철거 등을 각각의 사건으로 분절하여 다루는 경향이 짙었다. 그러나 보고서는 패트릭 울프(Patrick Wolfe)가 개념화한 정착민 식민주의의 '제거의 논리'를 정밀하게 투영함으로써, 이 모든 사태가 팔레스타인이라는 집단적 정체성을 사회적·물리적·정치적으로 소멸시키기 위한 단일한 국가 메커니즘임을 명료하게 논증해 낸다.

특히 본 보고서가 밝혀낸 가장 섬뜩한 지점은 폭력의 '탈제도화'와 '민영화된 국가 폭력'의 결합이다. 군대와 무장 정착민, 극우 정치 세력은 더 이상 분리된 행위자가 아니다. 정착민은 군복을 입고 지역 방위 대원으로 편입되었으며, 정착촌 출신 극우 인사들이 군 고위직과 국방부 행정권을 장악했다. 정착민의 포그롬(집단 폭력)은 국가의 불처벌(impunity) 아래 합법화되었고, 법적 정당성의 허울조차 벗어던진 노골적인 폭력이 일상이 되었다. 이는 단순한 군사적 점령을 넘어, 현지 토착민의 삶의 영토를 물리적으로 박탈하고 공포를 통해 자발적 퇴거를 강요하는 전형적인 식민지적 청산 방식이다.

또한 올리브나무 벌목, 수자원 장악, 은행 결제망 통제와 같은 일상적이고 구조적인 '경제적·생태적 질식'을 제거 기획의 핵심 기제로 조명한 점은 본 보고서의 이론적·실증적 깊이를 더한다. 폭탄이 떨어지지 않는 순간에도 팔레스타인 사회의 미래 세대는 교육과 의료, 식량 안보의 붕괴 속에서 서서히 궤멸당하고 있다. 즉, 물리적 학살과 더불어 삶의 존속 조건을 체계적으로 박탈하는 '느린 파괴' 역시 제거의 핵심 축임을 통렬하게 드러낸다.

결국 이 보고서의 칼끝은 이스라엘 극우 정권만을 향하지 않는다. 수십 년간 이스라엘의 만행을 '자제'와 '평화 협상 복귀'라는 공허한 외교적 수사로 감싸며 무조건적인 군사적·외교적 방패막이를 제공해 온 서방 국제사회의 위선을 적나라하게 겨냥한다. 가자지구의 비극이 서안지구의 전면적인 삶의 해체로 확장되는 지금, 비첼렘의 뼈아픈 기록은 국제사회가 이스라엘의 아파르트헤이트 체제 해체와 실질적 제재에 나서지 않는 한, 세계는 또 하나의 조직적 집단 소멸을 실시간으로 방조하는 공범으로 남을 것임을 강력히 경고하고 있다.

==

<The Elimination Project: 이스라엘의 서안지구 팔레스타인 공동생활 해체>

B’Tselem, <The Elimination Project: Israel’s Systematic Dismantling of Palestinian Collective Life in the West Bank>, 2026년 9월 14일

1. 보고서의 핵심 주장

이스라엘 인권단체 B’Tselem(베첼렘)의 이 보고서는 서안지구에서 벌어지는 정착촌 확대, 군사작전, 검문소 증가, 이동 제한, 토지 몰수, 정착민 폭력, 노동허가 취소, 체포와 정치활동 억압 등을 서로 분리된 인권침해 사건으로 보아서는 안 된다고 주장한다.

이 모든 조치가 결합하여 팔레스타인인이 서안지구에서 하나의 사회와 정치공동체로 존속할 수 있는 조건 자체를 해체하고 있다는 것이 보고서의 중심 명제다. B’Tselem은 이를 <Elimination Project>, 즉 ‘제거 프로젝트’라고 부른다. 여기서 elimination은 단순히 사람을 물리적으로 살해한다는 뜻이 아니다. 토지·경제·교육·가족관계·사회조직·정치제도·집단적 기억과 미래 전망까지 훼손하여 “이 땅에서 하나의 민족적 공동체로 살아갈 수 있는 능력”을 없애는 과정이라는 뜻이다.

따라서 이 보고서의 가장 중요한 질문은 “팔레스타인인 몇 명이 죽었는가?”에 그치지 않는다. 오히려 “팔레스타인 사회가 앞으로 이 지역에서 사회로서 살아남을 수 있는가?”를 묻는다.

보고서는 2023년 10월 이후 수집한 2,000건 이상의 팔레스타인 주민 증언, B’Tselem이 30여 년 동안 축적한 자료, 유엔 및 다른 인권단체 자료, 언론 보도, 이스라엘 정부와 군의 공식 문서 등을 활용했다.

2. 다섯 가지 ‘제거의 메커니즘’

보고서는 이 과정이 다섯 영역에서 동시에 진행된다고 분석한다.

첫째는 <폭력과 공포>다. 이스라엘군의 군사작전뿐 아니라 무장 정착민의 폭력이 팔레스타인 농촌과 목축 공동체를 압박한다. B’Tselem 자료에 따르면 2023년 10월 이후 2026년 9월까지 서안지구에서 1,000명 이상의 팔레스타인인이 사망했다. 다만 이 수치를 해석할 때는 주의가 필요하다. 이스라엘군은 사망자의 상당수가 무장대원, 공격자 또는 군과 충돌한 사람들이었다고 주장한다. 그러나 정착민 폭력과 그에 대한 군·경찰의 미온적인 대응이 농촌 주민의 이주를 촉진했다는 점은 이스라엘 매체인 <Times of Israel>도 상당 부분 확인하고 있다.

둘째는 <이동의 봉쇄>다. 2023년 10월 이후 약 200개의 새로운 검문소가 설치되었고 도로 차단과 마을 출입 통제가 크게 증가했다고 보고서는 설명한다. 그 결과 직장, 학교, 대학, 병원, 농지로 가는 평범한 이동이 예측할 수 없는 일이 된다. 문제는 단순한 불편이 아니다. 농부가 토지에 가지 못하면 농업 자체가 불가능해지고, 목자가 목초지에 가지 못하면 공동체가 결국 그 장소를 떠나게 된다. 즉 이동 제한이 경제적 압박과 영토 상실로 이어진다는 것이 보고서의 논리다.

셋째는 <경제적 질식>이다. 2023년 10월 이후 이스라엘에서 일하던 서안지구 팔레스타인 노동자 약 14만 명의 취업 통로가 사실상 차단되었다. 동시에 이스라엘이 팔레스타인 자치정부를 대신해 징수하는 세금의 이전도 지연되거나 공제되면서 자치정부의 공무원 급여와 공공서비스 능력이 악화되었다. 서안지구 실업률은 2022년 13.1%에서 2024년 31.3%로 급등했다.

B’Tselem이 이를 단순한 경제위기가 아니라 ‘제거’의 일부로 보는 이유가 있다. 생계가 붕괴하면 사람들이 토지를 떠나고, 교육·의료·지방정부가 약화되며, 공동체가 장기적으로 존속할 수 없게 되기 때문이다.

넷째는 <사회적·정치적 해체>다. 보고서는 활동가, 학생, 교수, 언론인 등에 대한 체포, 시위 제한, SNS 감시와 게시물에 대한 구금 등을 문제 삼는다. 여기서 감옥과 감시는 개인을 처벌하는 데 그치지 않고 집단적 정치행동을 위축시키는 역할을 한다는 것이다.

다섯째이자 최종 단계가 <강제적 이주와 영토 장악>이다. 정착촌뿐 아니라 소규모 정착민 목장과 전초기지(outpost)가 매우 넓은 농지와 목초지를 장악하는 수단이 되었다. 보고서가 인용한 자료에 따르면 이런 방식으로 정착민들이 사실상 통제하게 된 토지는 약 26만4천 에이커, 서안지구의 약 18%에 이른다. 수십 개의 팔레스타인 목축 공동체가 폭력과 접근 제한 때문에 떠났다.

이 다섯 과정의 핵심은 서로 연결되어 있다는 점이다.

폭력 → 이동 제한 → 생계 붕괴 → 공동체 약화 → 주민 이주 → 토지 장악 → 정착촌 확대라는 순환구조가 형성된다는 것이다.

3. 왜 스모트리치의 <Decisive Plan>이 중요한가

보고서에서 특히 중요한 대목은 현 재무장관 베잘렐 스모트리치(Bezalel Smotrich)가 2017년에 발표한 <Israel’s Decisive Plan>을 현재 상황을 해석하는 일종의 정치적 청사진으로 제시한다는 점이다.

스모트리치는 이 글에서 요르단강 서쪽 지역에는 두 민족의 독립적인 민족적 자기결정이 공존할 수 없으며, 유대인의 자기결정권만 존재해야 한다고 주장했다. 팔레스타인인에게 사실상 세 가지 선택을 제시했다. 유대 국가의 지배를 받아들이고 민족적 요구를 포기하거나, 이주하거나, 저항할 경우 군사적으로 패배시키겠다는 것이다. 또한 서안지구 깊숙이 정착촌을 확대하여 되돌릴 수 없는 현실을 만들어야 한다고 주장했다.

B’Tselem은 이것이 단순한 극우 정치인의 과거 발언이 아니라고 본다. 스모트리치가 2022년 이후 재무장관이자 국방부 내 서안지구 민간행정에 막강한 권한을 가진 장관이 되면서 토지·정착촌·계획정책에 자신의 구상을 실제로 반영할 수 있게 되었기 때문이다.

따라서 보고서의 핵심 주장은 “우발적인 과잉진압이 반복되고 있다”가 아니라 “정치이념, 행정권력, 군사력, 정착운동이 서로 결합하고 있다”는 것이다.

4. 이 보고서가 중요한 이유

이 보고서의 가장 큰 장점은 <사건 중심의 인권담론을 구조 분석으로 전환했다>는 데 있다.

집 철거 한 건, 검문소 하나, 정착민 폭행 한 건만 떼어 보면 각각에 안보상의 이유나 행정적 설명을 붙일 수 있다. 그러나 수백 개의 검문소, 토지 접근 금지, 노동허가 취소, 정착촌 확대, 정착민 폭력, 자치정부 재정 악화를 하나의 지도 위에 겹쳐놓으면 전혀 다른 그림이 나타난다.

이 점에서 보고서는 설득력이 크다.

더구나 이런 구조적 판단이 B’Tselem만의 독특한 견해라고 보기도 어렵다. 국제사법재판소(ICJ)는 2024년 권고적 의견에서 이스라엘의 정착촌 확대, 관련 기반시설, 토지와 자원 통제 및 법제도가 서안지구의 상당 부분에 “영구적이고 되돌리기 어려운” 이스라엘의 통제를 만드는 방향으로 작동하며, 팔레스타인인의 자기결정권을 침해한다고 판단했다. 또한 정착촌과 관련 체제가 국제법에 위배되고, 일부 강제이주와 팔레스타인 주민에 대한 차별적 이동 제한 역시 국제법에 어긋난다고 보았다.

따라서 B’Tselem의 ‘영토의 파편화 → 팔레스타인 공동체의 약화 → 이스라엘의 영구적 통제’라는 기본적인 관찰에는 상당한 외부적 근거가 있다.

5. 그러나 ‘Elimination’이라는 개념은 비판적으로 읽어야 한다

동시에 이 보고서의 분석 개념과 국제법적 범죄명을 구별할 필요가 있다.

B’Tselem이 사용하는 <elimination>은 별도의 국제법상 범죄 유형이 아니다. 보고서는 이를 정치사회학적 분석개념으로 사용한다. 즉 apartheid를 통치형태, settler colonialism을 그 정치적 논리, elimination을 그 논리가 향하는 방향으로 설명한다.

바로 이 점이 보고서의 힘이면서 약점이기도 하다.

‘제거’라는 개념을 처음부터 분석틀로 설정하면 서로 다른 동기에서 이루어진 정책들까지 하나의 목적을 가진 중앙집권적인 프로젝트처럼 해석할 위험이 있다. 군의 안보정책, 정착민의 종교민족주의, 정부의 재정정책, 관료제적 토지관리에는 서로 다른 동기와 행위자가 존재한다. 이들이 언제나 하나의 지휘체계 아래 움직인다고 입증하기는 어렵다.

특히 2023년 10월 7일 하마스 공격 이후 이스라엘이 제시해 온 테러 방지와 안보상의 논리를 보고서가 충분히 검토하고 반박했는가도 따져볼 필요가 있다. 예컨대 서안지구 사망자 수와 관련하여 이스라엘군은 상당수가 무장대원이나 공격자였다고 주장한다.

따라서 가장 엄밀한 표현은 “모든 조치가 처음부터 하나의 비밀계획에 따라 설계되었다”고 단정하는 것이 아니라, <서로 다른 제도와 행위의 누적된 결과가 한 방향, 즉 팔레스타인의 영토적·사회적·정치적 존속 조건을 약화시키는 방향으로 수렴한다>고 말하는 것이다.

오히려 그렇게 읽을 때 이 보고서는 더욱 강해진다.

6. 평론

이 보고서의 가장 중요한 통찰은 폭력을 ‘죽이는 행위’에만 한정하지 않는다는 데 있다.

한 사회를 없애는 데 반드시 모든 주민을 추방하거나 살해해야 하는 것은 아니다. 학교에 가기 어렵게 하고, 병원에 갈 수 없게 만들고, 농토에 접근하지 못하게 하고, 생계를 잃게 만들고, 한 마을에서 다른 마을로 이동하기 어렵게 하고, 정치조직을 약화시키며, 그 사이 빈 공간을 다른 인구집단의 정착지와 도로로 채우는 방법도 있다.

그런 의미에서 <The Elimination Project>가 던지는 가장 무거운 질문은 “서안지구에서 또 하나의 가자 전쟁이 벌어질 것인가?”가 아니다.

오히려 <대규모 전쟁이 없어도 한 민족공동체를 서서히 해체할 수 있는가?>라는 질문이다.

보고서의 답은 그렇다는 것이다.

그리고 나는 이 부분이 보고서의 가장 설득력 있는 지점이라고 본다. ‘Elimination’이라는 용어 자체에는 논쟁의 여지가 있지만, 서안지구에서 벌어지는 현상을 각각의 검문소·철거·정착촌·폭행 사건으로 잘게 쪼개어 바라보는 것 역시 현실을 왜곡한다. 그 결과가 어디로 향하고 있는지를 함께 보아야 하기 때문이다.

특히 스모트리치의 2017년 <Decisive Plan>을 현재의 제도 변화와 연결시킨 부분은 중요하다. 과거에는 이스라엘이 공식적으로 ‘점령은 잠정적이며 최종 지위는 협상으로 결정한다’는 외교적 언어를 유지했다. 그러나 지금은 정부 핵심 인사가 팔레스타인 국가의 가능성을 없애고 영구적인 이스라엘 지배를 확립하는 것을 공개적으로 정치목표로 제시한다. 바로 이 변화 때문에 B’Tselem은 현재를 단순한 ‘점령의 지속’이 아니라 <점령에서 사실상의 영구 병합으로 넘어가는 단계>로 이해하는 것이다. 이는 2024년 ICJ가 지적한 “영구적이며 되돌리기 어려운 통제”라는 판단과도 상당 부분 겹친다.

따라서 이 보고서를 한 문장으로 정리한다면 다음과 같다.

<이스라엘이 서안지구에서 하고 있는 일의 핵심은 팔레스타인인을 한꺼번에 제거하는 것이 아니라, 팔레스타인인이 그곳에서 하나의 민족·사회·정치 공동체로 계속 살아갈 수 있는 조건을 하나씩 제거하는 것이다.>

바로 이 점 때문에 <The Elimination Project>는 최근 서안지구를 이해하는 데 매우 중요한 보고서라고 평가할 수 있다. 동시에 ‘제거’, ‘정착 식민주의’, ‘아파르트헤이트’라는 강한 개념을 그대로 받아들이기보다는, 각각의 실증자료와 법적 판단을 분리하여 검토하면서 읽는 것이 가장 생산적인 독법이다.

==

No comments:

Post a Comment

Kenya's ghost writers help students abroad... - BBC World Service | Facebook

(2) Kenya's ghost writers help students abroad... - BBC World Service | Facebook BBC World Service  · Kenya's ghost writers help stu...