Israeli flags on a road to Rawabi, a planned city for Palestinians in the West Bank.Credit...Samar Hazboun for The New York TimesSkip to contentSkip to site indexSearch & Section Navigation
Account
OpinionGuest Essay
Israeli Expansionism Is Shaking the Middle East
Listen · 12:02 min
Share full article
261
By Megan K. Stack
Ms. Stack is a contributing Opinion writer who has reported extensively from the Middle East.June 8, 2026
In the past, Israel has traded land for peace. These days, it’s trading peace for land.
For years, Israel favored cold (or at most lukewarm) wars with unfriendly neighbors: containment, subversion by spies, the occasional assassination or one-off airstrike on a weapons facility or training camp. Not anymore. Since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, aggression and expansionism have come to define Israel’s foreign policy.
Israeli troops have taken over a broad swath of southern Lebanon, driving out more than one million residents and demolishing centuries-old villages. Israeli officials call it a “buffer zone” to protect residents of northern Israel from Hezbollah rockets. But some Israeli officials have threatened to flatten the territory, annex it and fill it with settlers.
In Iran, Israel eagerly tried to induce regime collapse, apparently unconcerned with creating a dangerous power vacuum in a country containing 11 tons of enriched uranium.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has bragged that his government helped cause the downfall of Bashar al-Assad, the former president of Syria. As the Damascus government fell, Israel invaded and occupied an area in Syria’s southwest, adjoining the land later seized in Lebanon. In Gaza, the Israeli army will enlarge its control to 70 percent of the enclave, Mr. Netanyahu said, and the expansion is likely to continue. Defense Minister Israel Katz has suggested the entire Palestinian population of Gaza should eventually be concentrated into a dystopian “humanitarian city,” built on the ruins of Rafah. Nobody would be allowed to leave the zone unless they emigrate, which Mr. Katz has called an open goal of the Israeli government. Meanwhile, a terror-fueled campaign of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank continues to push Palestinians off the land and expand Jewish settlements.
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
From the comments261B
Brock
GA
I think the biggest indicator of this is how the talking points of Israel's supporters have changed over the past two and a half years. We've gone from "Israel has a right to defend itself against Hamas" to "the U.S. would invade Canada if they were launching missiles too". In other words, they are having to rely on outlandish and false comparisons these days.Meanwhile, those of us who have been raising humanitarian concerns have been consistent the whole time: "Israel has committed, is committing and will continue committing crimes against humanity". I'm heartened to see that the majority of the U.S. population has come to this conclusion as well.Show full comment
Read 7 replies
Settlers and other religious Israelis who’ve grown powerful in Mr. Netanyahu’s far-right coalition often speak of a “Greater Israel,” with borders eventually expanding to consume all the land bequeathed by God in the Book of Genesis: Jordan and Lebanon, along with parts of Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. But to Mr. Netanyahu, who’s started referring to Israel as a superpower, the aim is probably more strategic than spiritual — to gain land and weaken or splinter neighbors perceived as hostile.
Emboldened by unstinting U.S. support during its devastation of Gaza, and with American forces by its side in attacking Iran, Israel is moving with disorienting speed on multiple fronts. Mr. Netanyahu attributes his country’s aggression to the bloody lessons of Oct. 7, which he insists was an attack not just by Hamas but “by the Iran axis, to try to annihilate us through a noose of death.”
“I said, ‘We’re going to change the Middle East,’” Mr. Netanyahu told CBS’s “60 Minutes” in an interview last month. “We’re going to change this condition where they’re ganging up on us, thinking they’re going to wipe out the one and only Jewish state.”
Image
Tents for displaced Palestinians around bombed-out ruins in Gaza City.Credit...Abdel Kareem Hana/Associated Press, via Ap Photo/Abdel Kareem HanaImage
Credit...Amir Levy/Getty ImagesThis bellicose stance has a whiff of delusion. Fractured, infighting neighbors may look less daunting than the hostile gallery of autocracies that ringed Israel back when Saddam Hussein, Muammar el-Qaddafi and the Assad dynasty still ruled. But failed states nurture terrorists and seed future violence. Gobbling up land deepens resentment.
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Most of all, an assumption of impunity and the willingness to use violence as a political tool are turning Israel into a pariah. Flush with U.S. aid, Mr. Netanyahu simply brushes aside the outstanding international arrest warrant accusing him of war crimes in Gaza. But Israeli aggression also threatens to fray the small country’s financial and diplomatic lifeline to the United States.
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
From the comments261R
Rose Levinson
London
I'm an American Jew, now living in London. I'm of the generation that thrilled at the birth of the Jewish state. For most of my adult life, the narrative I bought into saw Israel as exceptional, a place where Jews would show the world what it means to be an enlightened, shining democracy. Convenienty, I ignored the reality of the Occupation, seeing it only as a dot on an otherwise spotless landscape.How wrong I was not to recognize not only Israel's specific wrongdoing, but to fail to see it as a modern nation-state, with its own ruthless goals and desires. Watching Israel's cruelty, its expansionist and murderous actions, daily breaks my heart. I want to scream, 'no, no,'we' can't do this.' I don't want to take in the soul-crushing reality that we Jews are not exceptional, that we are as capable as any other ethnicity of base actions.Please let Israel stop calling itself a Jewish state, so I can get a modicum of relief from feeling somehow culpabable for what it's doing in my name.Show full comment
Read 4 replies
Between the carnage in Gaza and the widespread (and not unfounded) perception that President Trump started an unpopular war in Iran at Mr. Netanyahu’s prodding, U.S. public opinion has soured radically, and perhaps irrevocably, against Israel. Sixty percent of U.S. adults now have an unfavorable view of Israel; half of U.S. voters believe that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
“That is a huge threat to Israel’s national security,” said Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security adviser in Israel. “Israel needs the U.S. for everything.”
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Mr. Netanyahu has argued that Israel, for years the world’s top recipient of U.S. foreign aid, is now wealthy enough to wean itself off American military aid. He may be right. But cash is just one element of crucial U.S. support. The United States allows Israel access to a sophisticated arsenal that can’t be bought elsewhere (the F-35 stealth fighter jet, for example), overlooking U.S. laws that bar weapon sales to foreign military units committing serious human rights violations. Israel also leans heavily on the United States for intelligence, not to mention the U.S. veto at the United Nations Security Council that has repeatedly saved Israel from censure or sanction.
Without that veto, Mr. Freilich said, “Israel would have been under comprehensive sanctions decades ago.”
Perhaps Mr. Netanyahu is moving so fast because he recognizes the risks of dwindling American backing. But his willingness to create disarray has many of Israel’s neighbors eyeing it warily.
“Creating that kind of chaos can lead to a vacuum, factionalism, terrorist violence, insurgencies,” said Mohamad Elmasry, a media studies professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies. “But I think Israel is prepared to deal with that, especially if they’re able to expand borders while countries are trying to rebuild.”
From the comments261P
Public Interest Lawyer
South Florida
In a sane world, the United States would be imposing sanctions on Israel until its military aggression ceases and it withdraws from the occupied West Bank and south Lebanon. I cease to understand how our national interest is served by the blank check we give to Israel. International peace and security, even less so.Show full comment
Read 1 reply
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
In Lebanon, Mr. Katz said, Israel would follow “the model we applied in Gaza’s Rafah and Beit Hanoun.” It was a chilling comparison. Both places were bombed ruthlessly and then razed during Israel’s onslaught on Gaza.
“You drive through a town and there’s not a single house standing, because everything has been destroyed,” Ramzi Kaiss, a Beirut-based researcher with Human Rights Watch, told me.
Israel occupied southern Lebanon for nearly two decades, starting with a 1982 incursion to fight Palestinian militants. That invasion inspired the creation of Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militia whose guerrilla attacks drove Israel to withdraw in 2000. There is a sense of repetition here, of fruitless cycles of occupation and insurgency.
But what comes next? Israel has now ordered the evacuation of about one-fifth of Lebanon — an area much larger than originally suggested, stretching far beyond any buffer zone. Right-wing Israelis fantasize aloud about settling southern Lebanon, and Israeli officials have warned displaced residents that they won’t be back anytime soon. At the same time, Israel and the United States have been pressuring the Lebanese government to strip Hezbollah of its weapons — an improbable demand given the Lebanese military’s relative weakness and the sectarian volatility of such a move.
Image
An Israeli strike in southern Lebanon.Credit...ReutersAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Israel may view southern Lebanon as a bargaining chip to wield in negotiations, a prize to claim or a way to pile unbearable pressure on the Lebanese state. Whatever game Israel is trying to play, pushing this demand for disarmament on a weak central government risks setting off a civil war among Lebanon’s finely balanced sectarian communities.
“They don’t seem to be interested in, ‘How do we enable the growth of a stable state on our northern border?’” said Paul Salem, a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Syria remains frail and fragmented, with various armed groups controlling parts of the country, Turkish troops in the north and Israeli occupation in the south. In his efforts to pull Syria together, President Ahmed al-Sharaa remains badly hamstrung by a crushing Israeli bombing campaign that all but wiped out Syria’s military capabilities as the former regime collapsed.
In April, the Israeli government agreed to spend $334 million to move thousands of Israeli civilians into the Golan Heights, a Syrian plateau Israel seized in 1967 and later annexed, although international law forbids transferring civilians to an occupied territory. The move illustrates that today’s temporary security needs can become tomorrow’s border expansion. The Golan Heights was, until recently, Israel’s buffer zone against Syria. But now Israel has carved deeper into Syria and is moving to populate the old buffer zone with people who will be protected by the new buffer zone.
From the comments261Z
Zach
Boise
Maybe decades of Palestinian intransigence, both direct and via Iran, have exasperated Arab states as they have similarly broken Israel’s moderate political bloc. If Syria were interested in the Golan Heights they would have seriously negotiated, as did Egypt and Jordan under similar circumstances.Leveraging the Human Rights Watch or the UN as moral barometers in this mess is evidence of the writers failure to understand Israel. Leading up to October 7th Israel received more than 50% of the UN’s sanctions and resolutions - for EVERY UN member stat, for over a decade. They didn’t enforce anything in Lebanon. Israel disregards them for legitimate reasons, the UN needs to establish neutrality if they want agency.And the Human Rights Watch…they couldn’t even overcome internal resistance to issue basic statements of condemnation against Hamas following 10/7, not to mention the year plus it took to acknowledge the widespread, barbaric rape and murder that was employed.Show full comment
Read 2 replies
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
There’s no question that Israel is finding new opportunities in weakened states. As preparations to bomb Iran got underway this past winter, Israel secretly set up two covert bases in the remote desert of Iraq — apparently unbeknown to the government in Baghdad. When Iraqi troops approached one of the bases to investigate reports of suspicious military activity, Israel repelled them with airstrikes, killing one soldier and wounding two more.
Israel is even reportedly planning to set up a base in Somaliland (a breakaway state that Israel is alone among United Nations member states in recognizing) in order to fight the Houthis in Yemen and monitor the strategically important Bab al-Mandab Strait, which runs between Yemen and the Horn of Africa.
Oddly, the spate of expansionist gambits comes together with an Israeli push to normalize diplomatic relations with Arab states. The governments of both Israel and the United States are keen to expand the Abraham Accords, the Trump-mediated agreements that normalized Israeli ties with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. Both Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Trump consider the Abraham Accords a roaring success. But to Palestinians who felt that Arab neighbors ignored their plight to make deals with Israel, the accords suggested the futility of politics. It’s worth remembering that the Oct. 7 attack was launched just as Saudi Arabia, the kingpin of Arab states, was on the brink of normalizing ties with Israel.
It’s hard not to wonder whether the subtext is: Throw the Palestinians under the bus and make peace with us, or you risk becoming the next target.
Image
On the Israel-Gaza border.Credit...Amir Levy/Getty ImagesAdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
The region’s power brokers aren’t talking much about the Palestinians these days. Israel continues to restrict aid and keep up a patter of violence in a bomb-chewed and immiserated Gaza Strip, and Palestinians in the West Bank are still suffering daily repression at the hands of settlers and soldiers. But make no mistake: The unanswered demand for Palestinian sovereignty sits at the heart of all the regional upheaval, unacknowledged though it may be.
Mr. Netanyahu and his cabinet are in no mood to take the boot off Palestinians’ necks, however, and the Trump administration — despite growing public disgust — shows little interest in pressuring Mr. Netanyahu on behalf of the Palestinians.
Through money, protection and diplomatic overindulgence, the United States helped to create the aggressive Israel we see today. So what will we do now? Sometimes I recall the conversations, before Oct. 7 changed everything, when U.S. foreign policy experts talked about disengaging from the Middle East. The United States must pivot to China, they’d say. And yet here we are, ensnared in the one big war we didn’t particularly want, and can’t seem to figure out how to end.
Meanwhile, in Washington, legislation now moving through Congress would merge virtually all aspects of U.S. and Israeli defense technology — from research to manufacturing, drones to A.I. to biotechnology — to “promote the long-term integration of joint capabilities.”
Perhaps we are drifting toward a new status quo in which Israel, ever more integrated into the military-industrial complex, manages the region with the United States at its back. Maybe, if you want to empower a new manager, you give them the reins, and stop saying no.
AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENT
And so we are watching, encouraging and excusing as our closest regional ally keeps slipping deeper into a mess that will, one way or another, belong to us, too.
From the comments261J
John
Powell River
A chilling assessment for sure. With, at this time, both the Democrats and Republicans pretty much totally supporting Israel in all it does, even as most of the populace doesn't, there seems little to stop this from happening. But I think one must remember that states like Turkey and Pakistan, both with powerful militaries, and even Egypt, are not on board. The Gulf States will swing towards where the money is, and so far Israel has caused them to have lots of damage.
More on Israeli military action
Opinion | Shira Efron
Israel’s Isolation Is Deepening Fast. It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way.
May 28, 2026
Opinion | Rana Hanna
Lebanon, Where Cease-Fires Pave the Way to War
May 27, 2026
Opinion | Mairav Zonszein
For Israel, War Is the Only Answer
April 13, 2026
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
Megan K. Stack is a contributing Opinion writer. She has been a correspondent in China, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Afghanistan and the U.S.-Mexico border area. Her first book, a narrative account of the post-Sept. 11 wars, was a finalist for the National Book Award in nonfiction. @Megankstack
Read 261 comments
Share full article
261
No comments:
Post a Comment